|
 |
Louisiana Health Care
Review
THE MEDICARE
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATION |
|
|
|
Case
Review
|
|
Louisiana Health Care Review (LHCR) responsibilities
as a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) are to protect Medicare
beneficiaries' rights, improve quality of care, and protect the
integrity of the Medicare Trust Fund. Each case reviewed by the QIO
is for the purpose of one of these three objectives.
Each case is reviewed to determine if admission was
appropriate, reasonable, and medically necessary, whether the
services met professionally recognized standards of health care, and
whether all diagnosis and procedures billed are reflected in the
chart documentation.
Currently, Interqual’s Severity of Illness and Intensity of
Service (SI/IS) inpatient criteria and invasive procedure
criteria are the screening tools utilized for utilization
issues. CMS generic quality screens are used for quality
screening. |
 |
|
|
Current
Types of
Case Review Include:
Click on link below to
learn more
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficiary Complaint Response Program |
|
Louisiana Health Care Review (LHCR)
is authorized to review all written complaints received from
Medicare beneficiaries or their designated representatives.
Reviews are performed when there are concerns about
utilization issues, i.e. medical necessity/appropriateness of
setting, or the quality of care they received from any health
care provider regardless of setting. These cases are
thoroughly reviewed to determine whether the services met
professionally recognized standards of health care.
Currently each
beneficiary complaint goes through a medical record review
process that can take from 85 to 165 days for completion.
LHCR’s
physician reviewers (PR) review the medical record to
determine in any quality of care concerns exist. No direct
dialogue between the beneficiary and the physician or provider
occurs. The beneficiary may not know the result of the review
if the physician or provider does not agree to release this
information.
Beginning September 2003, LHCR will offer a new option for
reviewing beneficiary complaints – Mediation. All cases
will go through a preliminary review by a physician reviewer
before referral for possible mediation.
Helpful
Information about Beneficiary Complaint Response Program and
Mediation
|
|
This fact
sheet is designed to answer basic questions about
mediation. When you call Louisiana Health Care Review,
Inc. to file a complaint, a review case manager will give
you more details. If your complaint is suited for
mediation, the process will be further explained to you.
|
|
Mediation in the Medicare
Beneficiary Complaint Response Program |
The proven benefits of mediation will soon
be applied to the nation’s Medicare program, the health
insurer for 42 million beneficiaries across the country.
|
|
Mediation |
Mediation means Dialogue.
All cases will go through a preliminary review by a
physician reviewer before referral for possible mediation.
|
|
Hospital Issued Notices of Non-Coverage (HINN)
&
Notice of Discharge and Medicare Appeal Rights (NODMAR) |
|
|
Hospital- Requested
Higher-Weighted DRG Assignments |
|
Hospitals submit requests for
higher-weighted DRG assignment directly to the fiscal (Trispan
or Mutual of Omaha) intermediary for processing and payment. All
such requests granted by the intermediary are subsequently
selected by Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for
Louisiana Health Care Review (LHCR) review on a post-payment
basis. When reviewing hospital-requested higher-weighted DRG
assignments,
LHCR performs a medical necessity review, a quality review, and
DRG validation. The purpose of DRG validation is to ensure that
diagnostic and procedural information and the discharge status
of the patient, as coded and reported by the hospital on its
claim, matches both the attending physician's description and
the information contained in the patient's medical record.
When DRG validation results in lower payment, the hospital,
physician and intermediary are notified of the coding error that
resulted in increased payment when the hospital-requested
higher-weighted DRG assignments.
The hospital may
request a re-review of LHCR’s decision to change a DRG
assignment when the change results in a lower payment to the
hospital. |
|
Emergency Medical Treatment and Active
Labor Act (EMTALA) |
|
Congress enacted The Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA 90), to prevent hospitals from
refusing to treat individuals requiring emergency care or
inappropriately transferring or discharging individuals with
unstable
emergency conditions. Hospitals with emergency
departments are prohibited from transferring patients to another
facility without screening for emergency medical conditions,
stabilizing these conditions and determining if the benefit of
transfer outweighs the risk.
When the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) requests Louisiana Health Care Review (LHCR)
to review EMTALA cases (five-day or 60-day reviews), we assess
the following:
-
whether
the individual had an emergency condition;
-
whether the individual was
transferred appropriately;
-
whether the individual’s emergency
condition was stabilized;
-
whether the certification that the
benefits of transfer outweighed the risks was correct; and
-
whether there were any medical
utilization or quality of care issues involved in the case.
LHCR’s
review findings are forwarded to CMS for further investigations. |
|
Items/services that are experimental or are not
efficacious are excluded from Medicare coverage in all cases,
regardless of patient illness, treatment history, or setting.
Certain other items/services are also excluded from coverage in
all cases even though needed by the patient (e.g., routine
physical checkups or hearing aids).
The
intermediary/carrier, within the parameters of Medicare policy,
has the authority to determine whether specific items/services
are covered or excluded from coverage. The intermediary/carrier
must follow existing national Medicare policy (e.g., criteria in
the Coverage Issues Manual). When no national policy exists,
intermediaries/carriers have the authority to establish local
coverage policy. For some items/services (e.g., blepharoplasty
or breast reconstruction following mastectomy), coverage depends
upon meeting specific conditions of medical necessity and
reasonableness, such as type and severity of illness. The
intermediary refers inpatient claims to you involving
items/services that require a medical necessity determination
before the claims can be considered covered and payment can be
made.
For those
cases referred to Louisiana Health Care Review for coverage
review, we determine if the admission is medically necessary,
and if the services provided adhere to Medicare coverage
guidelines. |
|
Referrals from Other Agencies |
|
Medical reviews may be requested from
Congressional Offices, Fiscal Intermediary (Trispan or Mutual of
Omaha) or Carrier (Medicare Part B Services), Center of Medicare
and Medicaid Services (CMS) or the Office of the Inspector
General (OIG). Louisiana Health Care Review reviews all cases
requiring a medical necessity or quality of care determination. |
|
|
|
|

For
more
Quality Improvement
resources, visit
www.medqic.org |
|
|
[Home] [Privacy
Policy]
This Web site is produced by Louisiana Health Care
Review, Inc., the Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) for Louisiana, under
contract 500-99-LA02 with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
The contents presented do not necessarily reflect CMS policy.
If you experience any problems with this
site, please notify us by
e-mail. Thank you.
Louisiana Health Care Review, Inc.
©
2002-2007
8591 United Plaza Boulevard, Suite 270
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809
Telephone: 225-926-6353 / Fax: 225-923-0957 |
|
|